Recently, the act of public breastfeeding has come under attack from both Facebook and Bill Maher, and whoever oversees the medical board exams in Massachusetts has demonstrated an astounding lack of support for something the medical profession purports to support.
For those of you who have been busy folding laundry or hiking the Appalachian Trail or just trying to avoid news media, Facebook has not only removed photos of women breastfeeding their infants from their site, but they have banned at least one woman from the site altogether when she questioned why the photo was removed. Bill Maher, in his comments about lactivism and and an upcoming nurse-in due to an Applebee's restaurant in Kentucky requesting that a mother cover up when nursing her infant, compared public breastfeeding to public masturbation and said that the woman should have planned better or stayed home, and seemed incredulous that promoting breastfeeding, i.e. lactivism, is actually a cause for some people. In another act of outrageous stupidity, the organization that oversees the administration of medical boards has denied an MD/PHD candidate and nursing mother of a four-month-old any accomodation to pump her breasts during her day-long board exam. She has sued to have arrangements made for the test she is due to take next week.
Now, Facebook certainly has the right to choose its own content, and if they deem photos of a breastfeeding woman obscene, then so be it. This is my site, and if I deem references to Facebook obscene, so be it. What someone deems obscene is subjective, and we all the option of not looking at something that we deem obscene. Close your browser window, turn off the tv, avert your tender eyes; there is no need to call for the removal of the subject of your discomfort. I do have to question, though, why images of women in revealing bikinis are not deemed obscene, or the existence of hundreds of pro-anorexia groups on the site are not deemed obscene.
Bill Maher? Idiot. Clearly. Breasts are okay in public only for your enjoyment, and not for the purpose for which they exist? Come on. Comparing breastfeeding, something necessary to the sustinence of life, to masturbation, something antithetical to the sustinence of life, if you take a purely technical perpective (which I am only doing for the sake of argument, mind you), is patently absurd. And you can't tell me this is a man thing - I am surrounded by men supportive of breastfeeding. And Applebee's really fumbled the ball there. The woman shouldn't have been spoken to at all about what she was doing, and when told about the Kentucky law allowing women to breastfeed wherever and whenever they need to, the management of that restaurant should have been falling all over themselves to make their lactating customer comfortable. If someone was discomfited by it, they could have relocated the table of the Uncomfortable One so that they couldn't see what was going on, or provided a blanket to put over the head of the Uncomfortable One, not the baby. Again, avert your eyes if you don't like it - we do still have free will in this country.
As for the call to lactivism, these incidents are precisely why lactivism exists. Because sexualized images of breasts are so prevalent in this country that despite my breastfeeding 4 kids my own sister still thinks breastfeeding is "icky." That despite irrefutable evidence that breastfeeding is the healthiest way to feed your baby (for both mother and baby), most women still choose to bottle feed for no other reason than thinking breastfeeding is icky, and it is deemed something shameful by our ridiculous puritanical society. In Europe it is not shameful, and no one covers up. As my grandfather said in response to the Janet Jackson incident "Why is everyone so riled up? It's just a tit - seen one, seen 'em all." They're just tits, being used to feed babies. Not only is it not something shameful, it is a beautiful relationship, something that should be supported and encouraged as much as possible in this country, for the betterment of our own society. Healthier babies, healthier mothers, healthier society as a whole.
When I had my first job back in the late 80s, I worked in a children's shoe store. One evening a woman came in with a child in her arms, a large child, I'd say about 2 years old at the time, and the child was sleeping. So I thought. She asked me to fit shoes on the child while she held the child, which I thought was odd, but proceeded to measure the child's size. I was shocked when I realized that she was breastfeeding the child while I fit the child's shoes. My 17 year old self was ridiculously uncomfortable, in part because I had never been exposed to a breastfeeding child before, or if I had been it was a tiny baby, not a toddler. But I didn't refuse to help her, I didn't ask her to cover up, and I simply made sure I maintained eye contact with the mother. With age and maturity I've learned why it is so important to breastfeed, and I'm glad I didn't let my discomfort get in the way of letting that mother live her life.
As to whoever governs the medical boards (is it the AMA? Really, I'd like to know and write a letter to support that student/mother), it is absolutely ridiculous that an organization that governs the very health care providers to whom we entrust our quality of life won't make accomodations for this mother. I seem to recall the Hippocratic Oath including the line "Do no harm." Does this board not recognize that not allowing this woman to pump they are potentially doing harm to both the baby and her mother?
Those of use who choose to breastfeed and make the commitment to do so have an obligation to support and educate others about the benefits of breastfeeding*. We need to demonstrate that public breastfeeding is not shameful, that we need not half-suffocate our babies by covering them up, we need not take them to unsanitary places to eat. We need to do what it takes to support women to make the choice to breastfeed, by providing time and places for working mothers to pump, by providing information and help when needed. By averting our eyes if we really feel it's necessary, and by giving mothers a warm smile and thumbs up when we recognize that it's not.
*Please note that I do not condemn formula feeders. One of my children has been formula fed for some of her life. I recognize that the reasons women don't breastfeed are widely varied, and include some people who just can't for whatever reason. Women who feed their children formula are not demons who are poisoning their children by any stretch of the imagination. But our society as a whole needs an attitude adjustment in regard to how breastfeeding is viewed in our country.
I guess I am one of those listed (LOL) that had not hard anything about this. Sadly, I am not surprised. Angry? Yes. Surprised, No :(
I posted a link/post to yours because you covered it all so very well, but I wanted to spread the word on how ignorant people can still be. I want to do something, not sure what just yet, but I'll think it over & find ways to make it more acceptable.
I come from a place where it is accepted (not all that common, but accepted) so I am guessing that I will have to really work for this...but I WANT to, it is so worth it to ourselves & our babies!!
Posted by: Angi | September 19, 2007 at 07:24 PM
from the CNN story:
"The judge said the board offered Currier several special accommodations, including a separate testing room where she could express milk during the test or during break time, and the option to leave the test center to breast-feed during break times."
I don't see why she would have turned down a separate testing room... It seems to be a perfectly reasonable allowance that should have satisfied her needs.
Posted by: Agincourtdb | September 19, 2007 at 09:25 PM
Yes and no. A separate room is all well and good, but without additional time to tend to the pumping it doesn't really matter. When breastfeeding a baby that young you have to nurse or pump every 3 hours or so to maintain your supply and 45 minutes in breaks isn't enough to do that. If she is expressing milk DURING the test, as the clueless judge is suggesting, that takes her time and attention away from the test, possibly interfering with her ability to finish it on time, and therefore pass. Pumping successfully requires concentration and the ability to focus on your baby. Focusing on the test instead may impact the amount of milk she's able to pump.
Posted by: FishyGirl | September 19, 2007 at 11:11 PM
Well said. The idea that some consider nursing to be a sexual act baffles me.
Posted by: kirsten | September 25, 2007 at 04:44 PM
I formula feed, and I fully support breastfeeding! There seems to be a lot of judgment and confusion over the med student's accommodations. As someone else said, it's not enough time to pump. Also the extra time she's allowed because of her learning disabilities, something that I've seen a few posts on, are compensation for that. If she didn't need the extra time for test, she wouldn't have been granted it. She can't decide to use that time to pump nor should she even be asked to do that like some people are suggesting.
Posted by: Alex Elliot | September 26, 2007 at 11:39 PM
First of all, I would just like to say Thank You! for expressing the concern of so many of us-breastfeeders. I'm a new mom and I have the greatest difficulty breastfeeding my daughter in public. People staring, even gawking...it's supposed to be the most natural, beautiful thing yet I feel embarrassment and anxiety. Obviously I'm not gonna stay at home night and day because of the need for "privacy" and I'm certainly not going to make my child feed on an hourly schedule and then watch her cry hungry when in public if she doesn't cooperate (she's only a month old for God's sake). I'm from Mongolia and public breastfeeding there is not an uncommon sight. I couldn't be more surprised that a country as advanced as the United States could be so ignorant towards this. When I go to malls for example, besides a changing station, there are no chairs or areas where a mother can sit down and breastfeed. I've had to breastfeed my daughter in the bathroom where people are doing all sorts of stinky things. All I've gotta say is these things aren't gonna stop me from nourishing my child and neither should it anyone else.
Posted by: Jojo G. | October 01, 2007 at 10:50 PM
This is awesome! I'm doing a college paper on public breastfeeding and the ridiculousness of the squeamishness of Americans, and I just want to say More Power to you! Thanks for the info! I'll be sure to look up and put the facebook and Bill Maher stint in my paper!
Posted by: Felicia | November 06, 2007 at 08:36 PM